I was dismayed at reading this post in facebook by my good friend Rachit. This is a response to that post and I would suggest you read that first.
I can very well understand the frustration of Rachit and many others when conduction of events is ambiguous. Professionalism and transparency are of utmost importance. But what dismays me is the negativity in the article, and a lack of a unbiased point of view. I agree it is impossible to be unbiased, this article too is bound to be biased a little, but there seemed to be no effort to remove bias, and no effort to see any positives out of the event.
Rachit’s account of the run – up to galaxy is very very obviously biased. First of all, I vehemently disagree that discontent in the people of one hall led to pushing of galaxy in this year itself. I am quite sure there quite a number of people in Hall 2 as well who wanted the event to go through.
The hurdles that he mentions that Revival of Galaxy faced was -
1 ) Security 2) Judging of the event 3) Timing of the event
He goes on to say given the magnitude of the hurdles, the idea should have been dropped once and for all. These are the things going against galaxy. Let us look at the motivation for having galaxy itself.
The importance of an intra-institute inter-hall cultural&sports festival is HEAVILY underestimated. There is a reason IIT Kanpur consistently performs poorly in Inter – IIT in sports and there is such a poor participation in many of the club activities and I have long been of the opinion such an event is very much required.
IIT Madras has Schroeter and Lit-Soc (sports and cultural activities respectively) – 12 hostels have been contesting it for more than 30 years. IIT Bombay has a GC – Cult (General Championship) and GC – Sports. IIT Kharagpur also has it s respective General Championships. All of these institutes have a huge multi – hostel rivalry on par with the rivalry we see here – a rivalry based on judged competition for decades. In all these institutes, we see healthy rivalry. And please Rachit, an already “THRIVING” culture in IIT Kanpur? Thriving? Seriously?
Let us look at the obstacles Rachit said should have led to the idea being dropped once and for all. Security – it is a shame to the Students Gymkhana if it cannot ensure that it s students – supposed top intellectuals and definitely civilized at the least – can refrain from beating each other up. Possibility of bias in Judging – this is an issue that is a factor in any subjective event ranging from street cricket to International competitions – and having it as a REASON for NOT having galaxy? Definitely not so. And timing? The time between Antaragni and End – sems is 3 weeks as well! In a semester of 4 months, a 3 week gap I think is ample. And isn’t it very reasonable to ask for a weeks postponement of the event because no students stayed back? I think neither Hall2 OR Hall3 would have been able to finish their structures if not for that week.
So overall, I think it definitely was a right decision to go through with the event and Rachit’s suggestion that it should have been dropped then itself is I feel unreasonable.
As for the conduction of the event, I don’t think there is any reason to suspect foul play on a large scale. In most of the events, the judges announced the results themselves. And as for the nature of the events and the point system, there was equal representation from Hall 2 as well and heck, I’m sure Vaibhav is sensible enough not to be duped and to intervene if he feels there is something wrong. Most of the complaints I have heard is about the results – which is totally subjective and there is nothing to be done if the Judge feels differently from the strong crowd sentiment. We have to ask ourselves – how much of the complaints arise from disappointment rather than sound reasoning?
Yes, I agree the organization of Galaxy left much to be improved. The points system and Schedule etc. should have been intimated earlier. The rules should have been less ambiguous. The events should have been conducted more professionally. These are very serious issues that have to be rectified.
But to suggest that the event was mismanaged on purpose – just to make sure one hall wins – is a little extreme. He is very much justified in casting doubts on whether it was WELL – JUDGED. ( results of many events – dance drama, musicals, solo dance and not to forget structure too were controversial). But the way he has written the article – he seems to be carrying the conviction it was one whole rigged fraudulent event – which is totally unreasonable. And many of the flaws in conduction that he mentioned – though they definitely should not have been there – werent so big flaws as to change results of events ( which are – I reiterate again – totally down to judges and subjective)and thus, his claim that these were made so as to make sure one hall wins is definitely unreasonable.
Rachit goes on to say the purpose of Galaxy was lost and the expected increase in participation was not realized – with same students participating again. This is a statement purely out of disappointment. It is very evident to anyone even mildly involved in Galaxy that this saw a significant increase in participation and interaction. The number of GH – 2 girls in the dance, drama, musicals etc? The number of y8 baccha’s assiduously practicing Dumb Charades,speaking for Debate, declamation etc., solving cryptic clues and practising for word games in Lit events? The huge turnouts to watch the events – ranging from dance, musicals etc. to even the small quizzes? There was also DEFINITELY a huge increase in PG involvement. So this was very definitely a major plus point of galaxy and Rachit waving it away in one sentence I think is a big insult to all those who have put in effort to organizing the event.
And the need for such an event is further shown by how badly the unlucky took their loss in the various events. This holds for people of all halls of course. The lack of composure and level – headed reasoning was immature, whatever the result be.
Overall, I feel that having Galaxy was a step in the right direction. I feel very happy that the students finally realized the need for such a festival. The conduction could have been much better – but that will come with time as the students keep pro-actively being involved – and such complaints are sure to make next year’s coordinators much more careful.
Recent Comments